Legal Opinion

Condon v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals

1Opinion of the CourtHenbx, J.

This suit was instituted in August, 1879, to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff, a servant of defendant, alleged to have been caused by a defective handhold on the top of a box car from which plaintiff fell, while in the discharge of his duty as a brakeman at Pacific, a station on defendant’s 'road. The answer contained a general denial, a plea of contributory negligence on plaintiff’s part, and also negligence of plaintiff’s fellow-servants, and that the car was a foreign car, belonging to another road, and being hauled over defendant’s road.

The evidence tended to prove the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Waldhier v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Porter v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Long v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. McMullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Koerner v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Sullivan v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Rodney v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API