Weiskircher v. Connelly
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 218, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1912, No. 481, in equity from decree in partition proceeding of William O. Weiskircher v. Joseph' A. Connelly. Bill in equity for partition.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 218, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1912, No. 481, in equity from decree in partition proceeding of William O. Weiskircher v. Joseph' A. Connelly. Bill in equity for partition. Swearingen, J., filed the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 1. William O. Weiskircher is the complainant in the bill and the defendant in the cross-bill, and Joseph A. Connelly is the defendant in the bill and the complainant in the cross-bill. Both are residents of McKeesport, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and the land in controversy is situated…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We havé not been persuaded that any fact found by the learned chancellor beloiv should be disturbed. His legal conclusions properly followed his findings, and the decree of the court below, based upon both, is therefore affirmed.
Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Bednar v. BednarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Sivak EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- United States National Bank v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Fascione v. FascioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Fascione v. FascioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.