Thompson v. State

Appellant was convicted of maintaining a common nuisance under Acts 1925, ch. 48, §24, §2740 Burns 1926. The only error assigned is the action of the trial court in overruling appellant’s,motion for a new trial. In this appeal, we are called upon to determine four questions: Is the verdict of the jury sustained by sufficient evidence? Is the verdict contrary to law? Did the court err in admitting in evidence, over the objection and exception of the appellant, the testimony of the officers as to what was seized and what was observed by them while making such search? Did the court commit error…