Legal Opinion

Baker v. Baker

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 20, 1985No. 0507PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Respondent Annie J. Baker petitioned the family court to increase appellant Howard E. Baker’s periodic alimony payments based on changes in her circumstances and his ability to pay. The court awarded an increase in payments and attorney’s fees. We reverse.

In appeals from family courts this court can make findings of fact in accordance with its own view of the preponderance of the evidence. Mitchell v. Mitchell, 283 S. C. 87, 320 S. E. (2d) 706, 708 (1984); Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S. C. 81, 221 S. E. (2d) 773, 775 (1976).

In 1977 Mr. and Mrs. Baker were…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Von Herberg v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Calvert v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Garris v. McDuffieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Garris v. McDuffieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. McCall v. McCallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API