Legal Opinion

People v. Palmer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 27, 1986No. 84—718, 84—719 consPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

Defendant, Walter Palmer, was convicted of aggravated arson (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, pars. 20 — 1.1(a)(1), (3)) and aggravated battery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 12 — 4(a)), following a bench trial in the circuit court of Cook County. On appeal, defendant contends that (1) section 20 — 1.1(a)(1) of the Criminal Code of 1961 is unconstitutional and (2) the trial court abused its discretion by allowing his attorney to represent him while under a per se conflict of interest, thus depriving him of his right to effective assistance of counsel.

We reverse and remand.

Testimony at trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. The People v. StovalIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. KesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. LekasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. GassmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. People v. OrrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API