Legal Opinion

United States v. Soto

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 2008No. 07-30011PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM; Concurrence by Judge GRABER; 7Concurrence by Judge GOULD.

ORDER AND OPINION

ORDER

The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on November 28, 2007, is withdrawn and the Clerk is ordered to file the attached opinion in its place. New petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed.

OPINION

2Per curiam

Defendant Jose Martin Soto appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). He argues that the district court violated Carter v. Kentucky, 450 U.S. 288, 101 S.Ct. 1112, 67 L.Ed.2d 241…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GlasperIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. United States v. WhittenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. People v. MagallanesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. State v. RuoccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. People v. MagallanesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API