Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Newcomb

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1995No. 16-93-07418; CA A84239Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Defendant Newcomb1 appeals the trial court’s granting of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The issue is whether plaintiffs’ notice of default in the performance of a land sale contract meets the requirements of ORS 93.915(3) .2 Because no material facts are in dispute, we review the record in the light most favorable to defendant to determine whether plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1978). We affirm.

In 1984, plaintiffs, who own the property in dispute, entered into a land sale contract with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ying Loi Ho v. Presbyterian Church of LaurelhurstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API