Legal Opinion

St. Clair County Land v. Martin

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 26, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to affirm judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtBarclay, J.

The respondent has filed a motion to affirm the circuit judgment in this cause.

As motions to the same effect have been frequently made of late in other cases, presenting a similar state of facts, it may be well to shortly give the reasons for the ruling which this division of the court makes on the point involved.

The facts are that, at the July term (July 23), 1894; a judgment for defendants was rendered in the St. Clair circuit court. .

After moving unsuccessfully for a new trial, plaintiff appealed to the supreme court, in proper form, at that term. At the same time and term, plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boggs v. America InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  2. Rice v. McElhannonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wall v. Continental Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Crawford v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Cunningham v. RoushSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Columbus Coal Co. v. MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Lucas v. HeustonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API