State v. Glaude

Defendants were charged with and convicted of cattle stealing in the court below. On this appeal, they present but one question, and that is as to whether or not two of the persons who acted as jury commissioners were legally competent. It is not disputed that the parties in question were once lawful members of the commission, but is contended that they subsequently vacated their offices as such by becoming supervisors of a road district.

[1, 2] The record shows that these men did actually serve and perform the duties of road supervisors, but they never at any time took the oath prescribed by…