Weinstein v. Welden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, F. Stanwood Welden, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 30th day of April, 1913, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the New York Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
Appeal from a final judgment enjoining defendant, for a period of seventeen years, from divulging certain trade secrets and selling certain dental supplies without plaintiff’s permission., The defendant patented a process whereby porcelain *555could be used in filling teeth instead of gold or other metal. After the patent was obtained he made an oral agreement with the plaintiff by which they were jointly to undertake the purchase and sale of porcelain to dentists and others, with permission to use the patented process. The plaintiff’s part in the joint enterprise was to aid in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Pace v. PerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Dalury v. RezinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- McCarthy v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Dalury v. RezinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918