Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 25, 1983No. 83-445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

What constitutes a reasonable time within which to give notice of an accident under the terms of a policy of insurance is ordinarily an issue of fact. See Continental Casualty Co. v. Shoffstall, 198 So.2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 204 So.2d 327 (Fla.1967). Here, the appellee/in-surer failed to demonstrate conclusively that notice was unreasonable as a matter of law and, even if unreasonable, that the insurer was substantially prejudiced thereby-

While a presumption of prejudice follows a finding of unreasonable notice, that presumption may be overcome by competent evidence, Tiedtke v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holl v. TalcottSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Tiedtke v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Ramos v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Continental Casualty Company v. ShoffstallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stark v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. DAVID HIMMEL v. AVATAR PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. ELIZABETH NESBITT v. SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API