Gonzalez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
What constitutes a reasonable time within which to give notice of an accident under the terms of a policy of insurance is ordinarily an issue of fact. See Continental Casualty Co. v. Shoffstall, 198 So.2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 204 So.2d 327 (Fla.1967). Here, the appellee/in-surer failed to demonstrate conclusively that notice was unreasonable as a matter of law and, even if unreasonable, that the insurer was substantially prejudiced thereby-
While a presumption of prejudice follows a finding of unreasonable notice, that presumption may be overcome by competent evidence, Tiedtke v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holl v. TalcottSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Tiedtke v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Ramos v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Continental Casualty Company v. ShoffstallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stark v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- DAVID HIMMEL v. AVATAR PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- ELIZABETH NESBITT v. SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022