Legal Opinion

General Communication Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 8, 1960No. Docket No. 67528Published

1Opinion of the Court

OriNION.

Raum, Judge:

We have carefully considered the testimony and documentary evidence of record and have come to the conclusion that the accrued royalty liability in question was not sufficiently fixed or definite as of September 30, 1954, to warrant deduction at that time. The requirements for the deductibility of accrued liabilities have been variously stated. In Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 516, 519, it was regarded as settled law “that in order to truly reflect the income of a given year, all the events must occur in that year which fix the amount and the fact of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Producers' Fuel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924
  4. Bump Confectionery Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  5. New Process Cork Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API