State Ex Rel. Hood v. Louisville Tire Center, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Mississippi’s Price-Gouging Statute penalizes businesses that raise the price of their goods from the price charged “in the same market area ... at or immediately before” a proclamation of a state of emergency. 1 The State of Mississippi, through Attorney General Jim Hood, filed a price-gouging claim against Louisville Tire Center, Inc., d/b/a Fair Oil Co., for violations of Mississippi Code Section 75-24-25 (the “Price-Gouging Statute”). Fair Oil filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that the Price-Gouging Statute was unconstitutionally vague. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Brown v. Credit Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- National Endowment for the Arts v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ladnier v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- Bonner v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLCCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
- Bryant W. Clark v. Phil BryantMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- State of Mississippi v. Louisville Tire Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- In re D.D.H.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.