Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hood v. Louisville Tire Center, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2011No. 2009-CA-00052-SCTPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Mississippi’s Price-Gouging Statute penalizes businesses that raise the price of their goods from the price charged “in the same market area ... at or immediately before” a proclamation of a state of emergency. 1 The State of Mississippi, through Attorney General Jim Hood, filed a price-gouging claim against Louisville Tire Center, Inc., d/b/a Fair Oil Co., for violations of Mississippi Code Section 75-24-25 (the “Price-Gouging Statute”). Fair Oil filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that the Price-Gouging Statute was unconstitutionally vague. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Brown v. Credit Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  5. National Endowment for the Arts v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ladnier v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bonner v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLCCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
  3. Bryant W. Clark v. Phil BryantMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State of Mississippi v. Louisville Tire Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re D.D.H.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API