Legal Opinion

In re Mollineaux

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to compel the purchaser of an infant’s real estate to accept title.

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

The purchaser of an infant’s real estate sold in this proceeding objects to the title and this motion is made to compel acceptance. The purchaser’s sole objection is to the appointment by the .Supreme Court of a national bank as special guardian in a proceeding for the sale • of the real estate of an infant, asserting that such a corporation is • not among those qualified under section 2352 of. the Code of Civil Procedure, which he further asserts is the only authority for appointing a special' guardian in such a proceeding. Said section is as follows: “ Upon an application to sell, mortgage,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. Fellows Ex Rel. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CortelyouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API