Legal Opinion

Harkness v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1999No. Appeal No. 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from order and judgment insofar as it denied cross motion unanimously dismissed and order and judgment reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction over defendant. Jurisdiction was obtained over defendant when plaintiffs completed service in accordance with the order directing the manner of service pursuant to CPLR 308 (5) (see, Harkness v Doe, 261 AD2d 846 [decided herewith]).

The appeal by plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Harkness v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. v. CorbisieroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API