Legal Opinion
United States v. Norman Feigenbaum
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 29, 1992No. 1146, 1147, Dockets 91-1564, 91-1565PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns primarily the issue of whether a prosecutor’s commitment not to make a recommendation “at sentencing” prohibits the prosecutor from opposing a motion to reduce a sentence. The issue arises on an appeal by Norman Feigenb-aum from the September 3, 1991, order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Con. G. Cholakis, Judge) denying his motions pursuant to Rules 32 and 35(a), (b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to vacate, correct, and reduce the sentence imposed in this pre-Guidelines case. On appeal,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Joseph CorsentinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Harold T. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. William Boyd Ewing, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Stephen CarboneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. John Frank RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Lai-Moi Leung and Seow Ming ChoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Wagner-DanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Elice RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Robert W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.