Mitchell v. Northstar Panama City Beach, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We hold there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that appellant was properly served with process, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to set aside the default final judgment on the basis that appellant failed to demonstrate excusable neglect and due diligence. See, e.g., Szucs v. Qualico Dev., Inc., 893 So.2d 708, 711 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Allstate Floridian Ins. Co. v. Ronco Inventions, LLC, 890 So.2d 300, 303 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
We reverse, however, that portion of the triail court’s order as it relates to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Cellular Warehouse, Inc. v. GH CELLULARDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- SEC. Bank v. Bellsouth Adv. & Pub. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Bodygear Activewear, Inc. v. Counter Intelligence ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Bellsouth Advertising v. SEC. BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tata v. TataDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Robert Daley v. Elevate Roofing & Exteriors Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026