Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Scott v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1975No. 29434Published

1ConcurrenceHall, Justice

I concur in the judgment of affirmance for the reasons stated in Wynn v. State, 127 Ga. App. 463 (194 SE2d 124). "It is important for appellate judges to remember that 'A defendant is entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect one, for there are no perfect trials.’ Lutwak v. United States, 344 U. S. 604, 619 (73 SC 481, 97 LE 593); Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 135 (88 SC 1620, 20 LE2d 476); Brown v. United States, 411 U. S. 223 (36 LE2d 208). The work of a trial judge in a criminal trial is not an easy one. His language in colloquies with counsel, witnesses or jurors should not be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Sanford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API