Legal Opinion

Whittemore v. Stephens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant on his promissory note for $29,000 and defendant pleaded the general issue with notice of set-off. ' But at a later stage he put in a special plea puis darrein continuance and set up a composition made with the plaintiff and other creditors under section 17 of the amendment framed to the Bankrupt *576Law by the Act of June 22,1874. By this proceeding the-defendant abandoned his former plea and placed the issue of the suit entirely on the new plea. The original defence was eliminated, and all resistance to the action was reduced' to the point newly set forth.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Mount Wollaston Bank v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Home National Bank v. CarpenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Pierce v. GilkeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Johnson v. KibbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burt v. Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Pupke v. ChurchillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API