Legal Opinion

United States v. Murphy

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 27, 1989No. ACM 27422PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Following a heavily-litigated trial which the prosecution called a “war of attrition,” appellant Staff Sergeant Murphy was found guilty by a general court-martial consisting of members of wrongful use of cocaine, a violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. A significant portion of the prosecution’s evidence consisted of the results of a positive urinalysis indicating the presence of cocaine in the appellant’s urine. Her sentence is a bad conduct dis*575charge, two years of confinement, and reduction to airman basic. Before us, she raises four matters for our…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. Roger Lange v. Warren Young, Superintendent, Waupun Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. TrimperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. BurnsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. MurphyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API