Chesek v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
IRMA S. RAKER, J.,
Retired, Specially Assigned.
The question presented in these consolidated cases1 is whether a Special Committee, formed by the Legislative Policy Committee pursuant to Maryland Code (1984, 2004 Repl. Vol.), § 2-407 of the State Government Article, possesses subpoena power in the course of its duties. Appellants Craig Chesek and Gregory Maddalone challenge the authority of the Special Committee to subpoena and compel testimony. Appellee Adrienne Jones, co-chair of the Special Committee, argues that the subpoena action was valid. We shall hold that the provision granting the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Berry & State Farm v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Commonwealth, Aplt v. Williams, T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Johnson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Gomez v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.