Legal Opinion
Roche v. Floral Rental Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 4, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cubiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division, 95 N. J. Super. 555.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Goldmann, Sohettino and Haneman—7.
For reversal—None.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Goff v. Armbrecht Motor Truck Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Van Eeuwen v. Heidelberg Eastern, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- In Re Proceedings by the Commr. of Banking and Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Blessing v. ProsserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Young v. GilbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.