Legal Opinion

Heier v. Heier

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 1995No. Nos. 94-1008, 94-1258Published

1Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, Judge.

We affirm the order under review. However, in so doing we construe the order to have effected only a temporary change in custody from shared parental responsibility to sole parental responsibility and only a temporary suspension in the former husband’s right to visit with his children. It appears clear that the trial court, dealing with the escalating acrimonious relations between the parents and the effect of the former husband’s behavior on the child, sought to institute a stop-gap measure until psychological evaluations were performed. See Brago v. Brago, 604 So.2d 866…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sardinas v. SardinasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Brago v. BragoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Cenate v. CenateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API