Scarboro v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
1. “Embezzlement is an intentional and fraudulent appropriation of the goods of another by a person intrusted with the property of the same. In the common-law definition of larceny, we must remember, there are two gaps through which, in the expansion of business, many criminals escaped. The first of these gaps is caused by the position that to maintain larceny it is necessary that the stolen goods should have been at some time in the prosecutor’s possession. The second results from the assumption that when possession of goods is acquired bona fide by a bailee, no subsequent fraudulent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Goldin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Ex parte HedleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scarboro v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Scarbobo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Scarboro v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950