Legal Opinion

Harned v. Warner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1928No. 8103Published

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

This action at law was instituted by plaintiff in error as plaintiff below, against defendant in error and his wife, Helen F. Warner, defendants below, to recover the purchase price of 200 acres of land situate in Jefferson county, Okl., and for improvements placed upon the land hy plaintiff, by reason of breach of covenants of warranty and seizin contained in a deed of general warranty purporting to have been made to the land on October 17, 1917. The parties will be referred to as they stood on the record below.

On a trial before the eourt and a jury, at the conclusion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. WithrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Lafferty v. LaffertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Board of Education v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Burk v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Guthrie v. FieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API