Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Martial
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1893No. 100PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. In Admiralty. Libel by Thomas Martial and others against the ship Eclipse (Andrew Anderson and others, claimants) for "balance of seamen’s wages. Decree for libelants. 53 Fed. 273. Claimants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
McKENNA, Circuit Judge.
The facts of this case are fully and clearly stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the lower court, (reported in 53 Fed. 273). In his reasoning and conclusions we concur, and therefore adopt his opinion as the opinion of this court.
The decree of the district court is affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martial v. The EclipseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1892
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hogan v. The J. D. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1896