Legal Opinion

Hargrave v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 4, 1935No. 42355PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

The act of June 10,1926, 44 Stat. 717, provided, so far as material here, as follows:

“ Sec. 1. That for all purposes of this act the words ‘ staff officer ’ or ‘ staff officers ’ as hereinafter used shall be construed to include officers of the Medical, Supply, Chaplain, *644Construction, Civil Engineer, and Dental Corps of the Navy-only.
“ Hereafter all advancements to the ranks of rear admiral, captain, and commander in each of the staff corps above mentioned, including the advancement of staff officers who are or may be carried on the Navy list as additional to the numbers of such rank, shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. BarberUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  3. BordenUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  4. EspachUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  5. HuntUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API