Legal Opinion
State v. Rowman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 1976No. 7270PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
This case involves the interpretation and constitutionality of RSA 570-A:9, Procedure for Interception of Wire or Oral Communications. The attorney general over a period of six months obtained nine court orders authorizing wiretaps of telephones in Nashua and Litchfield. As a result of the investigation, one hundred and sixty-two complaints were filed charging twenty-three defendants either with gambling or with conspiracy to commit the crime of gambling or with both. RSA 647:2, 629:5. Various defendants filed motions to suppress evidence obtained from the wiretaps. After a hearing and the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. ArmocidaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Elvin Lee BynumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AssuntinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. AyresSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Calhoun v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984