Legal Opinion · Dissent

C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Capshaw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1930No. 21640Published

1Dissent

Two important questions are presented in the case at bar. The first, which I consider, is a matter of procedure. Should petitioner be permitted to dismiss his action? It is my view that this court's order denying petitioner's motion to dismiss is in excess of authority and an abuse of discretion.

2 R. C. L. 144, states the rule, par. 144:

"According to the great weight of authority an appellant or plaintiff in error may dismiss his appeal or writ of error without regard to the consent of the appellee or defendant in error. * * * The appellant has even been allowed to dismiss his appeal after…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API