Browning v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This appellant was indicted for the specific offense of “reckless driving,” and none other. The evidence is clear that the reckless driving, if done, was after the State’s witnesses attempted an unlawful arrest upon him.
As to this offense charged in the indictment and to which the trial of this case should have been confined, there is no controversy or dispute about the fact the defendant had committed no crime or offense at the time of his attempted arrest by the several officers. Nor is there any dispute or conflict as to the unlawful and unparalleled conduct and actions of said officers in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gassenheimer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Arp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. ToscanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Lindsay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- People v. PenaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1983
- State v. FogartySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Wilbanks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.