Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

John Moody v. Michigan Gaming Control Board

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 16, 2015No. 14-1511PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

The Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB) 1 regulates harness racing, a form of horse racing, in Michigan. In the course of investigating allegations of illegal race-fixing, Michigan horse-racing stewards asked Plaintiffs-Appellants John Moody, Donald Harmon, Rick Ray, and Wally Mcllmurray, Jr. (harness drivers) questions that the harness drivers construed as possibly self-incriminating. Invoking the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, the harness drivers refused to answer. Because of this refusal, the MGCB suspended the harness drivers’ licenses to race and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. David Haddad v. Randall GreggCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. John Moody v. Mich. Gaming Control Bd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. State v. GideonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Moody v. Michigan Gaming Control BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API