Tanav v. DHL
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The appeals referee disqualified the appellant from unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that, while he had twice given notice to a supervisor of his impending week-long absence from work, he had not done so to the proper superior as provided by the employer’s work rules. The Unemployment Appeals Commission affirmed. As a matter of law, however, these actions do not amount to “misconduct” under section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1993). Doyle v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 635 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); King v. Walgreen Co., 635 So.2d 997…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spaulding v. Florida Industrial CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Doyle v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Benitez v. Girlfriday, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Kelley v. PUEBLO WHOLESALE CO. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Nelson v. Burdines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zorrilla v. LURIA AND SON, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Pion v. Miami Paper & Plastic, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997