Legal Opinion

Tanav v. DHL

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 12, 1994No. 94-1101PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The appeals referee disqualified the appellant from unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that, while he had twice given notice to a supervisor of his impending week-long absence from work, he had not done so to the proper superior as provided by the employer’s work rules. The Unemployment Appeals Commission affirmed. As a matter of law, however, these actions do not amount to “misconduct” under section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1993). Doyle v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 635 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); King v. Walgreen Co., 635 So.2d 997…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. Florida Industrial CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Doyle v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Benitez v. Girlfriday, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Kelley v. PUEBLO WHOLESALE CO. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Nelson v. Burdines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zorrilla v. LURIA AND SON, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Pion v. Miami Paper & Plastic, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API