People v. Kleinman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrennan, J.
The principal question presented by this motion is whether or not the judgment of acquittal in the perjury case must be accepted as conclusive evidence of the fact that the defendant did not know and had not met Louis Luckman or any of the Luck-mans prior to the time when he so testified in June, 1936, at the conspiracy trial.
The conspiracy and perjury indictments together with the minutes of the perjury trial were furnished for use on this motion, and it definitely appears therefrom that the only question before the jury was: Did the defendant know or had he met Louis Luckman when he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. . GlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Krekeler v. . RitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. De Sisto, New York County Courts1961
- People v. Roderman, New York County Courts1962
- People v. CunninghamNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. Essex, New York County Courts1971
- People v. Trudeau, New York County Courts1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.