Legal Opinion

Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 5, 1924No. 404PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The very brief time we have hád- tó consider these issues and the urgency for announcing the conclusion which we all reached, precluded us from analyzing, distinguishing, and applying the many cases cited. Our announcement must necessarily be brief and cursory. The complainant prays that the county treasurer and the county sheriff, tax collecting officers of King county, be restrained from collecting the tax in issue, and that the city of Seattle, its officers and agents, be required to specifically perform the" contract between the plaintiff and defendant city for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Twichell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Walker v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Asia v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Port Angeles Western R. Co. v. Clallam County, Wash.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API