Legal Opinion

Graham v. United States

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided December 9, 1997No. CY-96-3170-RHWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY UNDER 33 U.S.C. § 702c AND SETTING TRIAL SCHEDULE

WHALEY, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Gary and Nancy Graham own and operate a cow-calf ranch and farm, known as Graham Ranch, in Yakima County, Washington, which is within the Wapato Irrigation Project (“WIP”). Flooding occurred on the Graham Ranch during the early months of 1995, 1996 and 1997. Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges that the flooding was caused by negligent construction by the Bureau of Reclamation of a fish screen on the WIP, and negligent maintenance by the Bureau of Indian Affairs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richard McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 607, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 947, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 997 State of Washington v. East Columbia Basin Irrigation District United States of America, East Columbia Basin Irrigation District, Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Islands, Inc. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1999
  2. Deborah M Manchester v. Sivantos GMBHDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  3. Private Client Fiduciary Corporation v. ChopraDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API