Legal Opinion

Paules v. Sminkey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 1981No. 257PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

Occasionally, our courts are faced with situations wherein the spirit underlying our rules of civil procedure is obviated by some members of the bar, and as a result, the goal of providing for the swift, orderly, and efficient administration of justice is often obstructed. Far too frequently counsel for litigants discredit the objective of court rules in order to obtain unfair advantage over their adversaries. For in stance, under the rule which provides for the taking of default judgments, we cannot condone the course of conduct followed by counsel for appellee in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shainline v. Alberti Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Silverman v. POLISSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Brooks v. Surman Dental Lab, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Moyer v. Americana Mobile Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Queen City Electrical Supply Co. v. Soltis Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Triffin v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. N.H. Weidner, Inc. v. BermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Marzullo v. Stop-N-Go Food Stores of Pittsburgh, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Butterbaugh v. Westons Shopper City, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Giallorenzo v. American Druggists' InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API