Mortensen v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent
Mortenson was charged with violating the False Pretense Statute (3073-4, Pope's Digest). The check on which this prosecution was based was drawn on a bank in which the depositor had an account, but in which account the funds were insufficient to cover the check when presented.
I most respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which holds that the cashing of such a check constituted obtaining money under false pretenses; because the record here affirmatively shows that there was no representation made at or before the time of cashing the check at the bank in Hot Springs. In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Maxey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937