Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mortensen v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 1949No. 4538Published

1Dissent

Mortenson was charged with violating the False Pretense Statute (3073-4, Pope's Digest). The check on which this prosecution was based was drawn on a bank in which the depositor had an account, but in which account the funds were insufficient to cover the check when presented.

I most respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which holds that the cashing of such a check constituted obtaining money under false pretenses; because the record here affirmatively shows that there was no representation made at or before the time of cashing the check at the bank in Hot Springs. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Maxey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API