Legal Opinion
Sookul v. Oroboro, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 8, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00675Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SANJAY SOOKUL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 24-CV-675 (RA) v. ORDER OROBORO, INC., Defendant. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Pending before this Court is Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. ECF No. 17. Before ruling on Plaintiff’s motion, this Court must assure itself that service has been properly effectuated. See Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin Trading Corp.,
619 F.3d 207, 213
(2d Cir. 2010) (“[B]efore a court grants a motion for default judgment, it may first assure…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Old Republic Insurance v. Pacific Financial Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Fashion Page, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin Trading CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Parker v. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. v. Episcopal Church Home & Affiliates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023