Legal Opinion

Chew v. Chew

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1920No. Appeal, No. 210PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 210, Jan. T., 1920, by defendant, from order of C. P. Delaware Co., Sept. T., 1919, No. Ill, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in case of Mary J. B. Chew and Martha Morris Brown v. Benjamin Chew. Assumpsit for purchase money on contract for sale of land. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 210, Jan. T., 1920, by defendant, from order of C. P. Delaware Co., Sept. T., 1919, No. Ill, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in case of Mary J. B. Chew and Martha Morris Brown v. Benjamin Chew. Assumpsit for purchase money on contract for sale of land. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Johnson, P. J., filed the following opinion: This is a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The action is for purchase money upon an executory contract for the sale of land. The contract calls…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below directing it to be entered.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brubaker v. LauverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Cargill Commission Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Betts v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Herskovitz's Estate No. 1.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Tuttle's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API