Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Erie Concrete & Steel Supply Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1946No. Appeal, 105Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff brought an action in assumpsit against defendant and ashed for an accounting under section 11 of the Practice Act of 1915, as amended, 12 PS §393. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The court below dismissed defendant’s motions for a new trial and judgment n. o. v. and directed that judgment be entered on the verdict, upon payment of the jury fee. Defendant has appealed.

It is well settled that a judgment for an accounting is interlocutory and not appealable: Miller v. Belmont P. & Rubber Co., 268 Pa. 51, 66, 110 A. 802; Hall v. Haines, 38 Pa. Superior Ct. 517.

T…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Belmont Packing & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Hall v. HainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API