Legal Opinion
Grubb v. WM. CALOMIRIS INVESTMENT CORPORATION
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1991No. 90-285, 90-427PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
On this appeal from a judgment of possession entered in favor of the landlord, appellant-tenant argues that the trial judge failed to conduct the proper balancing of factors under Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. Yasuna, 498 A.2d 1151 (D.C.1985), before permitting the drastic remedy of forfeiture of a lease. We disagree and affirm.
I
The Wm. Calomiris Investment Corporation (landlord) sued W. Dennis Grubb (tenant) for possession of a residential rental apartment unit, alleging that tenant had violated two provisions of their lease — covenant 7 and covenant 29. 1 The trial judge awarded judgment for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Pritch v. HenryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cooley v. Suitland Parkway Overlook Tenants' Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Smith v. WARREN PETROLEUM CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Shapiro v. TauberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- De Szunyogh v. William C. Smith & Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Suggs v. Lakritz Adler Management, L.L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.