Legal Opinion

Berry & Co. v. County of Hennepin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 2011No. A11-0399PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Following a trial, the Minnesota Tax Court determined the value for property tax purposes of relator’s property in Way-zata, Minnesota. Relator, Berry and Co., Inc. (“Berry”), appeals to our court, claiming that the tax court erred in determining the highest and best use for the property and in valuing the property. We affirm.

Berry contested the 2007 and 2008 assessed values of the subject property, which is located at 253 Lake Street East, Wayzata, Minnesota. The subject property totals 53,227 square feet. There are three buildings on the subject property, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. v. County of CarverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Eden Prairie Mall, LLC v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Harold Chevrolet, Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Hedberg & Sons Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Connexus Energy, Relators v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Beck v. County of ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. 444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Menard, Inc., Relator v. County of ClaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. County of Aitkin, relators v. Blandin Paper CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API