Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Martin v. Richard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1976No. 5463Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDomengeaux, Judge

I am in agreement with my brothers of the majority in their affirmation of the District Judge’s findings on several of the issues. I feel that the trial judge correctly ruled that defendant committed a battery upon plaintiff’s 13 year old daughter, and I am of the opinion that his award of $500.-00 for bruises resulting therefrom was not an abuse of his discretion.

However, the majority affirms the trial judge’s specific finding that the minor’s affliction of secondary amenorrhea was not causally connected to the beating administered by the defendant. Thus the trial judge denied plaintiff any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broussard v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API