Legal Opinion
Taschman v. University of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 29, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Damages in a fraudulent misrepresentation action are not recoverable if they did not result directly from the fraudulent misrepresentation or if they are speculative (see, Dress Shirt Sales v Hotel Martinique Assocs., 12 NY2d 339, 343-344; Reno v Bull, 226 NY 546, 553; Delcor Labs. v Cosmair, Inc., 169 AD2d 639, 640, lv dismissed 78 NY2d 952; Mihalakis v Cabrini Med. Ctr., 151 AD2d 345, 346, lv dismissed in part and denied in part 75 NY2d 790). Defendant is entitled to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Dress Shirt Sales, Inc. v. Hotel Martinique AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Mihalakis v. Cabrini Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Delcor Laboratories, Inc. v. Cosmair, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Estate of ObersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Serbalik v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- OSJ, Inc. v. WorkNew York Supreme Court · 1999