Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation v. Holyoak

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2017No. 15-15858Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWallace, Circuit Judge

I concur in Sections I and III of the majority opinion. I agree that a cy pres-only settlement was appropriate in ‘this case and do not contend that the district court abused its discretion in calculating class counsel’s fees.

I dissent, however, from Section II of the opinion, in which the majority blesses the district court’s approval of the settlement, despite the preexisting relationships between class counsel and the cy pres recipients. To me, the fact alone that 47% of the'settlement fund is being donated to the alma maters of class counsel raises an issue which, in fairness, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. In Re Baby Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Nachshin v. Aol, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re Lupron Marketing and Sales Practices Litig.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API