Legal Opinion
Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1912No. 10016PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered August 11, 1911, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to enjoin the enforcement of a city ordinance.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On July 13, 1904, the city of Tacoma enacted the following ordinance:
“Be it ordained by the city of Tacoma:
“Section 1. Every firm, person or corporation within the city of Tacoma, who shall use any stamps, coupons, tickets, *255cards or other similar devices for the sale of goods, wares and merchandise, which said stamp, coupon, tickets or other similar devices, shall entitle the purchaser receiving the same to procure from any other person, firm or corporation any goods, wares or merchandise free of charge, upon production of any number of said stamps, tickets, coupons, cards or other similar…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Steele v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
- Fleetwood v. ReadWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Stull v. De MattosWashington Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Shell Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- City of Seattle v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Tacoma v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. City of TacomaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.