Zimmerman v. Auerbach
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentElias Hansen, J.
I dissent. The negligence charged in the complaint was that defendant carelessly, negligently, and unsMllfully applied electrical appliances to plaintiff’s hair and scalp. The injury concerning which she complains was a severely burned scalp and overbaked hair resulting in her head becoming blistered and her hair falling off and coming out, thus causing plaintiff great pain and suffering and mental distress and anguish. As I read the record which is brought here for review, neither the pleadings, the evidence, nor the instructions which the court gave to the jury support the views expressed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lochhead v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Fowkes v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1915
- Industrial Commission of Utah v. Wasatch Grading Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
- Kendall v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Holt v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 1895