Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Wagner & Russeks Fifth Avenue, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,.
Concededly there was between the parties a contract containing a broad arbitration clause relating to “ any ” dispute that might arise for any cause with respect to the “meaning, scope, intent, applicability, operation or interpretation” of the contract. The parties by their agreement to arbitrate have invested the arbitrator with judicial functions in a particular case; all questions of fact or law are submitted to him for final decision; and the courts *826do not review arbitrators’ decisions de novo on the merits (Fudickar v. Guardian Mut. Life Ins. Co., 62 N. Y. 392, 399-400;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- Autoridad Sobre Hogares v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- In re the Arbitration between Ganser & New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- In re the Arbitration between Cohen & CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Lopez v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Arbitration between Florida Molasses Co. & First National Oil Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.