Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Lipscomb

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from a decree of the Circuit Court of Cumberland county. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The object of this suit is to construe certain clauses in the wills of Elizabeth W. Spencer and George W. Daniel, and ,to set up a remainder, by way of executory limitation, in the children of William Daniel in an undivided moiety of two tracts of land situated in Cumberland county, Virginia, known as the “Gibson” and “Springfield” tracts.

The circuit court held that the children of William Daniel took no interest in the moiety of the lands devised to John S. Daniel by the will of his father, George W. Daniel, construed either alone or read in connection with the will of Elizabeth W. Spencer,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Snyder v. GrandstaffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  2. Randolph v. WrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  3. Elys v. WynneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1872
  4. Waring v. WaringSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  5. French v. Logan's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WellfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  2. Stephenson v. KuntzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rinker v. TroutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. McKown v. McKownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Vicars v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API