Legal Opinion

Fruge v. Langley

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1933No. 1091PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LE BLANC, Judge.

This suit has for its object the setting aside of an alleged illegal sale of the plaintiff’s automobile under fieri facias, and the recovery of damages in the sum of $359, of which $250 is for the violation of property rights, and $100 for deprivation of the use of the automobile.

Defendants successfully urged a plea of lis pendens before the district court, and, from a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, this appeal was taken.

Plaintiff alleges a nonobservance on the part of D. M. Langley, a constable in Evangeline parish, who conducted the sale of the automobile, of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jenks v. GullaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Fruge v. LangleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API